LIVE
...

Follow us on

NBA

Charles Barkley smells something ‘fishy’ about Paul George’s 25-game suspension

Photo by Andrew Burke-Stevenson/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
Photo by Andrew Burke-Stevenson/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
Follow us on Google Discover

Charles Barkley has voiced serious doubts over the circumstances surrounding Paul George’s 25-game suspension, suggesting the situation does not fully add up.

The NBA legend questioned how the league handled the case, particularly given the explanation tied to mental health treatment.

Barkley’s comments sparked further debate, with fellow analysts also expressing confusion over how league policy was being applied.

Paul George #8 of the Philadelphia 76ers reacts against the Atlanta Hawks during the second half at State Farm Arena.
Photo by Jonathan Bachman/Getty Images

Charles Barkley questions Paul George’s suspension explanation

Barkley shared his concerns during a televised discussion, with the clip later on ESPN NBA’s X handle.

“It’s something fishy going on here. Now, I don’t joke around about mental health. But if you’re taking something for mental health, there’s got to be an outlier to the NBA. Like man, if it doesn’t make sense to me, it doesn’t make sense because I like Paul George,” Barkley said.

He added: “But if the NBA, and DeMar DeRozan, whom we love and Kevin Love, they’ve been the two most outspoken for mental health. But if you’re taking something for mental health, even if it’s on the list, you should get a hall pass.”

Barkley made it clear that his skepticism was not directed at George personally. Instead, his focus was on whether league rules sufficiently account for treatment tied to mental health.

Kenny Smith highlights a contradiction in NBA policy

Kenny Smith echoed Barkley’s confusion, framing the issue as a logical inconsistency.

“If this is the accurate scene of what happened, isn’t this an oxymoron? Like a contradictory of terms. You have mental health, and you’re taking medicine for it that you can’t,” Smith said.

He added: “To me, that’s why I don’t understand it. I’m not sure what drug or medicine he was taking, but that is a contradictory of terms.”

Smith’s remarks reinforced the idea that the suspension raises broader questions beyond a single player. Both analysts stressed the importance of protecting mental health while maintaining league standards.

The discussion has since intensified scrutiny on how the NBA balances its anti-drug policy with player wellbeing. For many observers, the case has become a flashpoint in an evolving conversation the league can no longer avoid.