LIVE
...

Follow us on

NBA

Giannis Antetokounmpo takes a sarcastic dig at being the real GM of the Milwaukee Bucks

Photo by John Fisher/Getty Images
Photo by John Fisher/Getty Images
Follow us on Google Discover

Giannis Antetokounmpo has responded to claims that he acts as the Milwaukee Bucks’ de facto general manager, using sarcasm to push back on the narrative.

The discussion around Giannis’ influence has followed him for years, especially as one of the league’s most dominant players. But his latest comments make it clear he sees that perception very differently.

Rather than embracing it, he chose to address it head-on, and his response carried a clear message.

Giannis Antetokounmpo #34 of the Milwaukee Bucks looks on against the Dallas Mavericks during the third quarter at Fiserv Forum.
Photo by Patrick McDermott/Getty Images

Giannis Antetokounmpo denies being the decision-maker for the Milwaukee Bucks

Speaking in comments reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Giannis Antetokounmpo addressed his role in team decisions.

He said, “I’m telling you the truth. I see, of course; I interview, but I don’t make the decision. That’s everyone, not just me. All the players, well not all of them – for the longest time it was Bud [coach Mike Budenholzer], Giannis and Khris [Middleton].

“But I don’t make a decision. I was the youngest player on the team.”

The explanation suggests involvement in discussions, but not authority over final calls.

Giannis Antetokounmpo jokes about GM salary amid Bucks perception

Giannis then addressed the narrative more directly, using humour to underline his point.

“There’s only 24 hours in a day. And also if this is what they believe, I should get paid more. I don’t know what the salary of a GM is; I should get the salary of a GM. I should get the salary of the coach. I should get more,” Antetokounmpo continued.

He concluded, stating: “Sorry, if that’s what they believe, I should get more. But it doesn’t matter what they believe. I know what is the truth.”

The comment reflects frustration with how his influence is perceived externally.

It also reinforces his stance that while he may be consulted, he is not responsible for the decisions often attributed to him.