Tottenham Hotspur Harry Kane didn't score, but Mauricio Pochettino's side claimed a 2-2 draw against Manchester City yesterday.
Manchester City fans have slated Tottenham Hotspur striker Harry Kane’s display against them yesterday.
Kane was starved of service during Tottenham’s 2-2 draw with City, and his only shot of the match came from inside his own half.
Kane began the campaign with a brace on opening day, but the Tottenham striker was far more quiet at the Etihad Stadium.
And City fans feel that the Tottenham striker rarely makes an impact against them.
Kane always goes missing against us. Doesn't worry me in the slightest.
— Samuel Houghton (@Sam_DH_MCFC) August 17, 2019
City magnificent. Spurs damn lucky, were awful for majority. Kane may as well have stayed at home and watched on TV.
— Blue Tone - MCFC (@MCFCTone) August 17, 2019
Genuinely forgot kane was playing #MCIvsTOT #TOTMCI #PremierLeague #MCFC #COYS
— Matthew Saunders (@saunderslfc94) August 17, 2019
Kyle Walker,best right back in the world..
— Dav8 (@Mr_Anthropy8) August 17, 2019
Harry Kane,most overrated striker in the world..
Bernardo Silva in the top 5 best midfielders in the world..
Ederson,best goalkeeper in the world..
VAR-worst thing ever to come into football#MCFC
Has Otamendi let Kane out of his pocket yet?
— Daniel (@danielcity22) August 17, 2019
Are we gonna talk about Harry Kane being placed in Otamendi’s back pocket?
— lucas (@LucasProelia) August 17, 2019
Kane the whole game in otamendi's pocket #MCITOT
— Edward (@EdwardCollen369) August 17, 2019
City supporters may be frustrated that they were not able to beat Tottenham, despite largely dominating.
Pep Guardiola’s side managed to keep most of Tottenham’s danger men quiet throughout the contest, but Spurs showed greater ruthlessness in front of goal.
Tottenham scored their goals through Erik Lamela and Lucas Moura as they managed to pick up a credible point against the league champions.
Spurs and City are now both on four points after their first two Premier League matches this season.
Have something to tell us about this article?
