Danny Ings was in action for Southampton against his former club Liverpool on Saturday.

Liverpool fans have mocked Southampton forward Danny Ings on Twitter for his miss on Saturday afternoon.
Ings featured for Southampton against his former club Liverpool at St. Mary’s Stadium in the Premier League.
The 27-year-old forward did not start the match, but the England international came on as a substitute in the 64th minute.
The former Bournemouth and Burnley forward scored for the Saints in the 83rd minute, but he also missed a very good chance to restore parity for the home team.
Ings joined Southampton on a season-long loan deal from Premier League rivals Liverpool in the summer of 2018, and the move was made permanent this summer for a transfer fee reported by BBC Sport to be worth £20 million.
The 27-year-old made 23 starts and one substitute appearance for the Saints last season, scoring seven goals and providing three assists in the process, according to WhoScored.
The forward has played 92 minutes in the Premier League for Southampton this season, scoring one goal in the process, according to WhoScored.
Liverpool fans have mocked Ings on Twitter for his miss for Southampton on Saturday.
Below are some of the best comments:

Anyone else reckon Ings missed that chance on purpose?
— PP (@LFC_Pranav) August 17, 2019
Respect to Danny Ings for missing that sitter at the end to ensure we got all 3 points #LFC
— Arun (@Kainthyy) August 17, 2019
Good old Danny Ings #LFC through & through!
— Steve Lloyd (@SteveLloyd_10) August 17, 2019
Yes someone should tell him Ings is now playing for Southampton
— Irish Red (@SocietyofOne1) August 17, 2019
If Ings touches that ball w his left it would have been 2-2. @LFC
— 2x Equal Pay (@DaveDo) August 17, 2019
This game went from why we sold Danny Ings to why we sold Danny Ings#lfc #SOULIV #PremierLeague
— Rohan Gaikwad (@roanRATT) August 17, 2019
Thanks agent Ings...for missing that sitter #LFC
— Pedro J. Salazar C. [E] (@ppedrossalazar) August 17, 2019

Have something to tell us about this article?

