Ineos were in danger of letting the Bryan Mbeumo transfer turn into a saga that could define their early time at Manchester United, but once the noise settled, they pulled off a clever move.
There were plenty of cautionary tales under the Glazers, from the drawn-out Frenkie de Jong chase to big-money signings like Antony and even further back with Di Maria.
Up until then, Ineos had managed a calm summer and January window in 2024/25, but questions started to surface when it came to how they handled the Mbeumo deal.
The delays frustrated fans, and the final terms didn’t help. But there’s a part of the agreement that explains why things took so long. On top of that, Ineos followed up the announcement in a way that completely changed how fans saw it.
Ineos’ perfect response after Bryan Mbeumo announcement

United made the Mbeumo signing official just before the squad headed to the US for their pre-season tour.
It ended a transfer saga that dragged on for over a month, during which Brentford were accused more than once of not dealing in good faith.
Even so, Mbeumo’s move always seemed inevitable. And after his arrival was confirmed, Ineos made it clear they were just as annoyed with how things played out as anyone else.
Unusually, United briefed several media outlets about how Brentford repeatedly changed their demands during negotiations.
They even asked Mbeumo to accept lower wages just so United could meet a higher transfer fee – not something you often hear about in public.
Ineos responded by pushing back through the press, helping to reset the narrative and distance themselves from any suggestion of incompetence.
- READ MORE: Patrick Dorgu backs Man United teammate to bounce back after Leeds draw: ‘Everyone wants to redeem…’
Ineos’ strategy could have lasting impact for both clubs
Ineos leaking details of the Mbeumo deal could damage Brentford’s reputation as a talent hub, as United’s complaints could deter future players from seeing the club as a stepping stone.
For United, the message is clear: they won’t be pushed around in negotiations. The club made it known that any attempts to change terms late in the process will be met with public pushback.
It’s a notable shift from previous windows, where deals like Antony’s £85m move from Ajax or the drawn-out pursuit of Frenkie de Jong left the club looking reactive and indecisive.
This time, even though the deal took 44 days, it may prove worthwhile if it helps reshape how Manchester United are viewed in future transfer dealings.
Receive exclusive football transfer news and updates twice a week to your mailbox
