Challenge to $13bn JPMorgan settlement rejected

Gavel

The U.S. government urged a federal judge to throw out a lawsuit seeking to scuttle its landmark $13bn settlement with JPMorgan, rejecting a claim that the accord let the largest U.S. bank off too easily.

Reuters reports that Better Markets, a nonprofit critical of Wall Street, had in February accused the government of 'unilaterally' engineering a backroom accord giving JPMorgan "blanket civil immunity" for selling shoddy mortgage securities before the financial crisis.

It said this violated the constitutional separation of powers and called for a judge to review the November settlement.

The accord included a $2bn fine payable to the U.S. Department of Justice. The Better Markets case was prompted by the department's decision not to make its accusations public in a lawsuit before settling with JPMorgan.

In a court filing on Monday night, however, the Justice Department said its decision to settle was 'presumptively' unreviewable, and that Better Markets lacked standing to sue.

To access the complete Reuters article hit the link below:

U.S. rejects challenge to $13 billion JPMorgan Chase Settlement 

Bank of England's Bean sees echoes of crisis build-up in markets 

JefferiesAnd the Best Place to Work in the global financial markets 2016 is...

Register for Financial Markets News Alerts