Billy Davies has gone, but was he really the source of Forest's problems?

Forest City Ground

A hectic day in the East Midlands leaves Nottingham Forest fans none the wiser about who will be the man to lead the club in the future.

After the news of Billy Davies' sacking broke, it was expected that former Leeds United boss Neil Warnock would take over the reigns at City Ground, at least until the end of the season.

However the former Leeds and QPR boss last night decided to reject the role at the City Ground.

According to BT Sport presenter Darren Fletcher, it came after Warnock said the 'conditions weren't right' and because of that, he no longer has interest in the job.

 

The news that Warnock wouldn't be taking over as Nottingham Forest manager didn't seem to bother many Forest supporters, in fact the majority seemed pleased with his decision.

However, his reported reason for rejected the role at the City Ground could prove to be disconcerting for supporters, as Darren Fletcher killed talk that the length of the contract was the issue.

Sheffield-based writer Alan Biggs hinted that the conditions referred to could be due to the clubs owners:

If the reports turn out to be true - and it is purely speculative, then I simply cannot feel for Nottingham Forest supporters enough.

Fawaz Al-Hasawi and his family have put a lot of money and time into the club, however, if he is arguing with potential managers over matters such as team selection then I find it difficult to see how they will ever become successful.

It begs the question, if he can't let up with an experienced manager over team selection, how will he feel delegating his duties to a CEO? A role that he has promised supporters to fill in the summer.

In my opinion, unless there is a complete change in mentality at the very top of the club, it threatens to undermine any sum of money put into the team.

It's important to realise that investment is only a small part of owning a football club.

Register for HITC Sport - Daily Dispatch